Section
Cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, digital government, privacy, and the technology economy of the capital region.
October 4 edition
September 29, 2026 section update
September 29, 2026
Current and former AI researchers are warning that competitive pressure could outpace safety work as systems become more capable of assisting with AI research itself. Their concerns sharpen the debate over testing, transparency, and independent oversight.
Read full report →Evergreen library
Federal agencies, defense organizations, universities, contractors, and security companies create strong demand for cyber expertise across the region.
The field includes governance, risk, engineering, incident response, policy, and training—not only technical penetration testing.
Read article →Automated readers can help locate vehicles connected to crimes or missing-person cases, but large databases also raise questions about retention, sharing, access, and oversight.
Sound policy defines a narrow purpose, limits access, records searches, sets deletion schedules, and provides independent review.
Read article →Agencies may use AI to organize information, detect patterns, improve services, or support decisions. Public-sector use requires attention to accuracy, bias, security, procurement, and appeal rights.
Human accountability remains essential when automated systems affect benefits, enforcement, employment, or access to services.
Read article →Use unique passwords stored in a reputable password manager, enable multifactor authentication, update devices, and treat unexpected links with caution.
Backups protect against theft, hardware failure, and ransomware. Small consistent habits prevent more harm than occasional complicated changes.
Read article →